To determine a Ground Control Point (GCP) postion requires careful planning. The accuracy of the overall survey will be influenced by both the GCP design and their location.

In photogrammetric surveying, a good rule of thumb for spacing of GCP is around twice the flight height.  With average operational UAV flight heights typically ranging between 75 – 120 m, this means spacing should fall somewhere between 150 – 240 m horizontally.

Placement of GCP should be made both around the periphery of the survey area in addition to placements scattered internally.  Where flight boundaries coincide with another, the common boundary should share common points.  This is particularly important where composite models are being created.

GCP position should also consider (select drop down for more detail):

Survey area and number of available GCP

Spread the coverage across the survey area to increase accuracy. In a standalone rectangular flight areas generally 5 GCP sites are used. Typically, one point is placed near each corner of the survey area, with the fifth GCP fixed centrally.

Aerial view of a survey site showing multiple Ground Control Points (GCP) marked with numbers in a forested area, highlighting their strategic placement for photogrammetric surveying.
Theoretical design of triangular GCP layout for 75 m flight height with semi-permanent GCP located around periphery and 1 temporary location in centre of work area

Consider, GCP locations as vertex of a triangle. The area within the triangle will have the greatest accuracy as images are interrelated to more than one control. The area outside the triangle will decrease in accuracy as you move away from it as images become reliant on an adjacent processed image rather than the controls.

Longevity of the chosen location

It is important that GCP be positioned on a site where they have minimal opportunity for disturbance, thereby increasing their longevity and reducing the necessity to replace them in the future.

Installing a semi-permanent GCP network for a site that is surveyed on a regular basis enables a “ready-to-fly” posture, avoiding the need to install or construct an extensive ground control network prior to each survey. Furthermore, utilising the same control locations not only saves preparation time prior to flying, but also improves comparative accuracy between different time-based models assisting in model merging and reconciliation.

Relationship to other surveys

Often is the case that we only want to survey what has changed within a larger area. When thinking about a GCP network design patterns of GCP to meet all you aerial surveying needs at different times and for different requirements.

For example, you might have a layout for stockpile areas and processing, another layout for the entire pit, another for the current active mining area and another that covers the entire site. These layouts can form subsets of a larger area and combinations of different points. Working in this way allows flights to be designed for stakeholder needs, yet they can still be merged with larger datasets to create combinations of other areas.

Elevation of terrain

Attempt to locate GCP across the entire elevation range of the site being surveyed.

Field of view

Placement of GCP should always consider their capture field of view. Ensure each GCP is observable from different directions. Control points which can be observed over a greater proportion of the captured data set will provide better opportunity to integrate control.

Avoid placing GCP next to higher objects that obscure their view. The more times that a GCP can be identified in different capture images then the better the meshing of information will be during data processing.

Use of a GIS software can be invaluable when drafting a plan to attain a holistic view of where GCP should be located and avoid clumping or omission of areas.


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending